Ashok Subron: "For certain people, I have become the party to take down"

Invited to the show "Au Cœur de l’Info" on Thursday, April 23, Minister of Social Integration Ashok Subron gave a candid assessment of the government's actions. He pointed out administrative delays, controversial reforms, and political tensions, asserting his commitment to the cause while hinting at the possibility of leaving if commitments are not honored.

In a context of rising living costs, price tensions, and an uncertain international climate, Ashok Subron was a guest of Prem Sewpaul on the program "Au Cœur de l’Info" on Radio Plus. The frank and at times incisive exchange allowed the minister to address several sensitive issues, particularly pension reform, budgetary decisions, and internal tensions within the majority.

At the beginning of the interview, the minister acknowledged a certain discomfort regarding the pace of implementation of the measures expected by the public. While he remains convinced of the government's willingness to progress, he laments a persistent slowness in decision-making. "In 15 months, I have learned a lot and I remain committed to my beliefs. But what annoys me is that for certain people, I have become the party to take down," he remarked, visibly irritated by the criticism aimed at his party, Rezistans ek Alternativ (ReA).

He emphasized the role of his political party within the government alliance, stating that ReA acts in accordance with the commitments made while upholding its core values. "We had a consultation with the Prime Minister, and as I have always said, ReA adheres to its agreement with the government alliance. We have requested a reorganization within the government, with a list of proposals. If it aligns with the desired direction, we will remain. Otherwise, we reserve the right to leave the government," he warned.

This stance comes amid a turbulent political climate marked by internal tensions and recent upheavals, including the resignation of Paul Bérenger as Deputy Prime Minister. According to the minister, these events have contributed to slowing down government dynamics. "The government has experienced quite a few shocks in such a short time. The departure of the DPM, the energy crisis linked to the war, and global uncertainty. We are still working to lay the foundations for the next 30 years," he stated, highlighting the need for structural transformations.

On the economic front, Ashok Subron did not shy away from the difficulties faced by Mauritians. With rising prices, fuel costs, and pressure on purchasing power, he acknowledged the tense situation. In this context, he proposed establishing a Crisis Solidarity Fund to support the middle class. "Contributions are necessary, yes, but in a legal manner, with a well-established framework. Not like during the COVID-19 period where we witnessed significant mismanagement. We must act responsibly!" he urged, calling for collective and structured mobilization.

When questioned about the perceived absence of the Prime Minister in public communication regarding current challenges, the minister offered a nuanced perspective. He believes the head of government is acting within a particularly complex context. "He is doing what he can in a difficult period. With internal tensions, the war in the Middle East, and energy issues, the situation is not simple," he explained, stressing the importance of a unifying message.

The pension reform issue was also addressed. On this point, Ashok Subron acknowledged shortcomings in the decision-making process. He stated that some decisions were made without prior consultation, even within the government. "I must be clear, we were not informed. There was no consultation. The Prime Minister took it upon himself," he declared, revealing a degree of frustration.

The minister also commented on criticisms related to public appointments, particularly those that resulted in failures or incompatibilities. He admitted that the situation is concerning. "When we look at certain appointments, it is regrettable to see incompatibilities between some individuals and the goals we are pursuing. There is a slowness in executing decisions," he pointed out, calling for greater rigor and coherence.

Despite these criticisms, Ashok Subron reaffirmed his political commitment. He stressed the necessity of championing a vision focused on social justice, ecology, and workers' rights. He also highlighted the importance of combating drug issues, which he considers a priority. Despite these reservations, Ashok Subron remains steadfast. He insists on the need to stay true to a political line centered on social justice and the protection of the most vulnerable. For him, it is not merely about managing urgency but fundamentally transforming certain pillars of the system. "We are here to change the system," he asserted, while reminding that his commitment remains intact, especially on sensitive issues such as the fight against drugs and social inequalities.

However, at the core of the issue, the minister issues a political warning. Behind the words, a growing impatience is palpable in response to the delays and contested decisions. For Ashok Subron, it is no longer enough to express intentions: results are imperative. And if the course is not corrected swiftly, the question of the place of Rezistans ek Alternativ within the government could become not just theoretical but quite real.