Menlo Park Case: ASP Dussoye Accused of Bias, Heated Exchanges with Lawyers
Deepshika Gowreesungkur was extensively questioned by Assistant Superintendent of Police (ASP) Balmick Dussoye at the Anti-Money Laundering Unit (AMLU) before being allowed to leave the premises yesterday. Sources close to the case indicated that a motion to "strike out" was to be filed today in court. However, ASP Dussoye, who is leading the investigation, was absent due to a last-minute sick leave. He reportedly began recording a statement regarding a payment of approximately Rs 250,000 on the eve of the motion's presentation.
The lawyers representing Deepshika Gowreesungkur condemned what they describe as unacceptable tactics and maneuvers, arguing that they violate democratic principles and existing legal procedures. An audio recording mentioning threats and attempts at intimidation is currently circulating in private groups. ION News has obtained a copy of this recording.
Additionally, Deepshika Gowreesungkur's lawyers approached the Supreme Court today, Thursday, April 16. In a complaint drafted by attorney Jaykar Gujadhur, she requests that the police investigation against her be withdrawn from the Anti-Money Laundering Unit of the Central CID, which she deems "biased" and "not independent." Her petition specifically targets the Police Commissioner, the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP), and ASP Balmick Dussoye.
It is worth noting that this case is linked to the so-called "Menlo" investigation, concerning a loan granted by the Mauritius Investment Corporation (MIC) to Menlo Park Ltd. Deepshika Gowreesungkur claims to have fully cooperated with investigators while accusing ASP Balmick Dussoye of bias. She also mentions messages attributed to Rama Sithanen, which she believes indicate external influence in the investigation's proceedings.
According to her, this situation continues and may resemble a form of retaliation, incompatible with existing laws and the expected impartial role of a police officer. She further denounces what she describes as an illegal detention that occurred on April 15, 2026, claiming she faced threats.
It is also recalled that messages and audio recordings involving Rama Sithanen and his son had been made public during a scandal that ultimately led to Rama Sithanen's removal from the Bank of Mauritius.
